Analysis Of Operational Performance And Price Of Penataran Train On Surabaya City – Blitar Route

Fadli Rozaq; Nanda Ahda Imron; Rachmat Agil; Muchlisin muchlisin

doi:10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.2

Authors

Fadli Rozaq Indonesian Railway Polytechnic
Nanda Ahda Imron Indonesian Railway Polytechnic
Rachmat Agil Indonesian Railway Polytechnic
Muchlisin muchlisin Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.2

Abstract

The Penataran Train is the train that has the highest passenger volume among the Local Economy Trains in East Java Province. The Penataran train is very much needed by people, but if the operational and management is not handled properly, it may affect on the effectiveness and efficiency of the transportation system as a whole. Operational performance assessment is needed to improve the services to users of the Penataran Train in the future. Operational performance was assessed on several aspects, including load factor, travel time, frequency, headway, and ticket prices. The purpose of this study was to analyze the operational performance and prices of the Penataran Train on Surabaya City – Blitar route. The results showed that the average load factor was 61% and met the standard of SE No. 24 of 2020. The average rate of the train arrival time of 99% was in accordance with the SIPOKA standard. In contrast, the average rate of departure time of 83% was not in accordance with the SIPOKA standard. The frequency of 8 trips per day with a headway of 198.75-202.25 minutes was not meet the standards in KM No. 22 of 2003. The point of intersection between the respondents' ATP and WTP was at a price following the ticket price stipulated in PM No. 21 of 2020, which was Rp10,001–Rp15,000

References

A. B. Ismail, T. A. Setiono, and I. M. Suraharta, “Tingkat Kepuasan Penumpang Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Kereta Api Lokal Penataran Relasi Sidoarjo – Malang Kota Lama,” J. Perkeretaapi. Indones. (Indonesian Railw. Journal), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2020, doi: 10.37367/jpi.v4i2.131.

PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, “PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 72 TAHUN 2009, TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN KERETA API,” 2009.

I. Mufassirin, B. Arief, and P. Wiranto, “( Studi Kasus : Stasiun Kereta Api Tipe A Bogor ),” pp. 1–16, 2015.

M. R. Anditya, Arief Budiman, and M. Fakhruriza Pradana, “EVALUASI KINERJA PELAYANAN ANGKUTAN KOTA DI KOTA CILEGON,” Proc. 19th Int. Symp. FSTPT Islam. Univ. Indones., vol. Ch. 9 pp., no. February 2019, pp. 11–13, 2016.

U. Jati, M. Hidayat, M. I. Firdaus, and K. Kunci, “Ketepatan Waktu dan Okupansi Terhadap Kinerja Kereta Api Joglosemarkerto Punctuality and Load Factor of Joglosemarkerto Rail Transport ’ s Performance,” J. Manaj. Bisnis Transp. dan Logistik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 2020.

W. Adika and P. J. Osly, “Analisis Kinerja Operasional Kereta Api Jurusan Jakarta-Purwakarta (Studi Kasus Kereta Api Walahar Ekspres Dan Cilamaya Ekspres),” Indones. J. Constr. Eng. Sustain. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2018.

A. Nurhidayat, D. Utomo, R. Fajar, Sucipto, and H. Widyastuti, “Aircraft and High Speed Train Using the Logit Model A Case Study of The Jakarta-Surabaya Route,” vol. 186, no. Apte 2018, pp. 86–91, 2019, doi: 10.2991/apte-18.2019.16.

M. Hestika and M. Murtala, “THE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC NEEDS FOR RAIL TRANSPORT IN KRUENG GEUKUEH, ACEH, INDONESIA,” J. Malikussaleh Public Econ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2020.

H. Widyastuti, A. Y. Nurhidayat, A. Soimun, C. Setyarini, N. El Hafizh, and A. Leliana, “Analysis of mode transportation performance and satisfaction level of Jenggala Commuter Line (Sidoarjo-Mojokerto),” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 181, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201818103003.

R. C. Garing and S. A. Ramadhani, “Kajian Kinerja Operasional dan Tarif Kereta Api Tawangalun Malang–Banyuwangi (Malang–Banyuwangi).” Universitas Brawijaya, 2018.

R. P. W. Fakhrul Hartasantoso, “KAJIAN TARIF KERETA API PENATARAN JURUSAN BLITAR-SURABAYA,” Jur. Tek. Sipil Fak. Tek. Univ. Brawijaya.

R. Palka and K. Woronowicz, “Linear induction motors in transportation systems,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 2549, 2021.

M. Fricilia, “Evaluasi Penerapan Tarif Angkutan Umum Kereta Api (Studi Kasus Kereta Api Madiun Jaya Ekspres),” 2013.

A. Utanaka and H. Widyastuti, “Traffic Accident Cost Analysis Using Willingness-to-pay Method in Surabaya,” in 11th Asia Pacific Transportation and the Environment Conference (APTE 2018), 2019, pp. 223–226.

P. Lestari, D. Utomo, and A. Nurhidayat, “Analysis of Ability to Pay and Willingness to Pay of Aircraft passengers toward Jakarta Surabaya High-Speed Train,” vol. 186, no. Apte 2018, pp. 79–85, 2019, doi: 10.2991/apte-18.2019.15.

D. N. Wulansari and M. D. Astari, “ANALISIS ABILITY TO PAY(ATP) DAN WILLINGNESS TOPAY(WTP) PENGGUNA JAKARTALIGHT RAIL TRANSIT(JAKARTA LRT),” Teknol. Sipil 1.1, no. 11, pp. 13–20, 2017.

S. D. Hartantyo and H. R. Agustapraja, “Analisa Kinerja Ka Komuter Surabaya – Lamongan,” UKaRsT, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 9, 2018, doi: 10.30737/ukarst.v2i2.268.

S. G. Navitasari, A. Hasanuddin, N. N. Hayati, and S. Sulistyono, “THE SERVICE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MADIUN TRAIN STATION,” J. Rekayasa Sipil dan Lingkung., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 190–200, 2019.

A. A. Putra, “Analisis Keseimbangan Jumlah Armada Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Penumpang,” Media Komun. Tek. Sipil, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2013.

A. A. Zaniar, A. Y. Genovani, A. Hamdi, A. Sodikin, and N. Alfaridi, “Analysis Ability To Pay And Willingness To Pay For Low Cost Carrier ( LCC ) Airlines ( Case Study : Flight Jakarta to Surabaya With Citilink And Sriwijaya Airlines ),” no. Lcc, pp. 716–723.

N. A. Imron and A. Aghastya, “Evaluasi Tarif Kereta Api Perintis Dengan Metode ATP-WTP (Studi Kasus: KA Jenggala),” J. Perkeretaapi. Indones. (Indonesian Railw. Journal), vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.